In a fast-growing anger in the field of higher education, the national health facilities announced that the finances were late for the “direct” medical research at universities, including hazardous resources.
“It is difficult to be disastrous about how this will be disastrous about research and education programs,” Carl Bergstrom, Biology Professor of Biology, the University of Washington. “It is a deliberate effect. In measurements with any concerns about DEI services campuses. The goal destroys US universities. “
Success Monday, NIH plans to fund costly at 15 percent of all grants, down from a scale of 27 to 28 percent. Change means that colleges and universities are in a million dollars. We will be required to cut their budget or reduce the study activities to make a difference.
Republicans and President Trump have wanted to reduce money at indirect costs. The latest proposal is similar to the recommendation included in the project 2025, maintained a presiding company for the second Trump management of the President. The authors of Project 2025 The authors say the cap ‘will reduce the funding of the remaining agenda’s organization. “
Last year, $ 9B of $ 35B so that national health facilities (NIH) provided research is used for the administrative headache, what is not known as “the exact cost.” Today, Nih has reduced research centers to charge for 15% government, above … Pic.Twitter.com/fsupgks
– Neh (@nih) February 7, 2025
Historically, universities have been able to discuss the refund price of those indirect costs, according to the restoration of institutions in accordance with 28 percent. Some of the world’s leading research centers, including Harvard, Yale universities and Hozs Hopkins, receives a refund of more than 60 percent. NIH said at the telephone post office to preserve $ 4 billion from transformation; a Within the top The annual financial year’s analysis 2024 The grant data indicates that colleges can lose $ 4.3 billion in the NIh Reinlurments if indirect costs are 15%.
Earlier, if the college or university receives $ 5 million, it can be returned to $ 1.4 million to pay related expenses, such as the lease center. Under this new policy, the $ 750,000 will be held.
“The United States should contain the best research on the world,” Nih means in their announcement. “It is appropriate according to how much more money can go to directly disposed of scientific research rather than treatment.”
While nah said she had an indirect cost, Senator Matty Murray, Democrat from Washington, said Abocington, said the proposal illegal.
“It will mean falling off throughout the country, the layofs are in the red and green areas, and despise life-saving research for everything from cancer in OPIOIX,” said Murray.
Cut cuts in ‘Life-Savings’ of the study
While the NIh throws indirect costs as a burden, American University Barbara R. Snyder said the statement “Real and Real Costs of Costs in the past decades.”
A $ 4 billion prescribed to return the NIH grants, adding, “it is only based on a life-saving research that helps many American families.”
NIH worked hard to follow the main President Trump orders to complete all support for diversity, equality and installation and “sex Meology.” Reviews suspended for two weeks, driving researchers who rely on funding, and some scientists are concerned about the future of their money under the employee.
But investigators and their lawyers say that it is distracting $ 4 billion cut into the NIH fund – unprecedented by the Congress – the purpose of the United State of Science and will postpone the vaccine mentioned by the NOH.
“Reducing Return of these costs are there To cut off the medical study and symbolizing the federal government of the world’s commercial researchers, “said the action. Biomedical Innovation. “
NIH is the main source of the state of research universities, and has supported the success of the medical technology and treatment such as cancer and Alzheimer’s.
Ted Mitchell, US President of the US Council in education, said the decision was “we saw a while, we were unreasonable and dangerous.”
“We will be widely celebrated by our competitors, who will see this in what you are to – to give us strength to our medical research,” said Mitchell. “It is a self-injured wound that, if not returning, there will be bad consequences for US jobs, the competition world, and the coming growth of skilled workers.”
