The faulty peace agreement would not end war in Ukraine | Russian-Ukrainaini War

Today, we note three years of the full attack in Russia. For three years, Ukrainians showed a remarkable steadfastness, radio-glittering strategies in Russia Urv and forcing its troops to return to Kharkiv and Kherson.

The people of Ukraine continue to resist the Russian army attack, but the war has entered at all in the digestive stage where a large benefit will arrive, testing Ukrainian persecution and west of west to maintain support.

In this critical phase, new management in the United States sign a major change in its policy in Ukraine, which require a peace agreement. Last week, US and Russian officials met in Saudi Arabia to find straightforward conversations outside Ukraine on the table. The meeting and return from Washington has raised the fear of the management of the President Donald Trump lays a foundation for a broader descent and Russia.

In Ukraine, a basic issue is not a diliomacy to be followed – any war finally ends at the Directories table – but what discussions will involve. If most important to stop the fighting as soon as possible, there is an accident of Ukraine compressed in receiving their lasting concern than the war.

A recable history gives a clear warning to such a “peace”. In February 2014, Russia attacked Ukraine’s Crimen Peninsula and stayed there; Two months later, its troops and Pro-Russia’s troops began working in the Mpumalanga Donbas region, carrying a place. In August, Ukyau was compelled to discuss the discussions in France and Germany aiming to put the ranking of unpleasant terms.

What was known as Minsk I was signed in September that year, there was over six months. In January 2015, faithful armies in Moscow and units of Russian military units renew their attack in Ukraine to force him more agreements. In February 2015, a written agreement II was negotiated and signed, it made clear that Kyiv had to recognize the “special” situation “in the Donbas working busy Russia.

MINSK Agreements Finally fail to protect strong peace. It is organized to free the conflict rather than solve, allowing Russia to integrate the control of attacked areas while maintaining political and military Ukraine. Moscow has never followed its commitment, using a communication process to buy time, the regrop and prepare for further abuse.

Failed Failure Agreements are active legend: Homens that ignore the safety of Ukraina and the public expectations does not lead to lasting peace but simply reducing the following conflict.

Any accommodation must indicate the will of those who have endured this war for three years. The voting made in Ukraine clearly reflects what the Ukrailes want.

The fatigue is real, as shown by the vote brought by the Gallup in November, where 52 percent of the respondents said that they support negotiations. However, when it is spoken with any language of the country, only 27% that Ukraine should consider such action. Most Ukrainian people refuse to stop any country as part of the peace covenant.

These statistics highlight the unavoidable political truth: There is no broad support in Ukraine by a peace agreement that suits Russia’s benefits. Any Ukrainian leadership trying to discuss such words will face a great community pressure. And whether access to the discharge is reached, the efforts to use will be met by resistance.

This is why we and other Westilic policy makers have encouraged a quick solution that can ignore the will of the Ukrainian people. If they want a peace agreement to hold, they should consider continuing the support of Ukrainian army. Ukraine’s ability to negotiate with energy is based on the continuous success of the military and the combined state of the joint from their partners.

In making decisions on their Ukrainian policy, Western countries should not cross the Russian accurate. Moscow have been trying to cause power deception while hiding its growing risks.

The Russian authorities emphasized the Russian economy although there is a sanctions, their military services are encouraged and time is located. In the Riyadh representatives, representatives of Russians reportedly in Moscow are flourishing, restaurants are full and only western economy suffer from long-term participation in Ukraine.

The message was clear: Russia can fight long as they take while facing the west that looks decrease. This installation leads some west to conclude that a quick peace agreement – one based on Ukrainian agreements – it can be a very high-quality way forward.

But isn’t it. APPEASING Russia will increase its most easiest desire.

A way to ensure peace in Ukraine by setting a magnetic safety framework. Whether by NATO integration, Billateral Defensents or Organic European security framework, Ukraine requires concrete commitment. If this is not in any of the planting of peace, the risk of renewed conflict will remain high.

The next months are critical as the Warnington also deals with its role in Ukraine. While much unknown, one clearer is clear: Ukrainian fight is not limited to recovering the lost territory but also about ensuring its dominion is no longer mentioned. Whether the Western policy continues to sync with that goal or shifts to the path to the top of the next battle section.

The views displayed in this article is a writer itself and does not necessarily reflect the planning of Al Jazeera.