San Francisco High Court rules, deferred EPA’s power in Stormwater Discharges

Washington – The majority of the court ruled San Francisco’s decision on Tuesday, reducing the power of the Environmental Managers to prevent the production of immoral seawater.

The issue was a controversial issue over allowance levels used by the Environmental Protect Agency.

The storm climb from coastal cities can contaminate bays and oceans, but city authorities argue that they should not face the sorting of the sea unless they have come to plants of unclean homes.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. He agreed with San Francisco City and County officials and said permission “End” “is incorrect.

Even the city “who follows the specific requirement of his approval may have dealt with penalties when the water quality available falls below the appropriate standards,” said San Francisco vs. EPA.

He said EPA maintains sufficient authority to prevent water pollution.

“If EPA is doing its work, our catch should not have a bad force for water,” wrote.

Justice Amy Cony Sarreett, he noted that the law authorized EPA to enforce “any limit” requires protection of clean water.

Three Court officials – Juzle Jusstho Sonia Sotomolar, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson – agreed with the opposition.