Is the Grok 3’s Benchmarks false?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b44/99b44a59f3382e2af9cd1b73f0b99c7f4eac1169" alt="Is the Grok 3’s Benchmarks false? Is the Grok 3’s Benchmarks false?"
Disciples over Ai Benchmarks – and how they are reported to Ai Labs – they spill in public viewing.
This week, an Opelai employee blamed Elon Musk’s Ai Company, Xai, publishing the funeral results of its recent AI, Grok 3 Ear Earla, Igor Babushkin, insisted that the company was right.
The truth lies in a particular place in the middle.
On the post office in the blog of Xaxi, the company published the Greek performance in AIE 2025, a set of challenging statistical questions from the recent mathematical examination. Some experts also ask AIME’s authentic as Ai Benchmark. However, AIME 2025 and old test species are often used to investigate the skills of model.
Axai Greek revealed Beta Kheta Reasoning and Grok 3 Mini Reasoning the best, O3-High Realists, the senior workers in X and fast to remove XA’s graph O3-High-High
What is the life sentence @ 64, can you ask? Yes, it is short with “Consensus @ 64,” and basically provides a 64 model to respond to each problem on the bench and takes more generally produced answers as last answers. As you can imagine, the chances @ 64 tend to improve model models model models, and leave them from the graph may seem like one model passes more if not.
Grok 3 Reasoning 3 mini Thema 2025 Thinking AIME 2025 in “@ 1” – means the first score in the bench – falls below O3-Mini-High score. Grok 3 Consultation Future also follows-a little after the O1’s O1’s Model is set to “Medium”. However Xai Advertising Grok 3 As “Scorest’s Ai Ai.”
The Babylon oppose X that openly publish the same bench charts that mislead – Albeit charts are comparing its models. A neutral team This debate includes “an intuitive” graph showing efficiency of all models working on @ 64:
Hilarious how some people see my plan as an attack on Opena and some attacked Grok while actually is deeper in propaganda
(I really believe that Grok is looking good there, with the O3-minic TTC- * High * -pass @ “” deserves more exploration. Pic.Twitter.com/3whwhwhwhffouic– Teortaxes ▶ (Deepseek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) (@teortaxestEx) On February 20th, 2025
But as ai Nathan Lambert researcher pointing to the post office, perhaps the most important metric researcher is still a mystery: Computary (and currency) took each model to achieve each situation to achieve some status. That just shows how many Ai Benchmarks are in the limitations of models – its energy.