In the Editor:
I am sensitive to the full view of Steven Mintz’s dispute Within the top“Writing in AI” (April 2, 2025). AI adoption programs are not loyal. According to the teachings they rely on AI, they donate to relying between teachers and learners – not a good thing. And because AI “acquisition works by examining things such as smoothness or” slipping “in writing, by fully entry: We are tempted to look at the highest.
Mintz article may mislead, however. He testifies often to check the adoption software, whose non-contributions have produced certain scores as “percentage AI produced.” For example, he writes, “27,20 percent of the fragment of January 2019 … was considered Ai Adge experience. Although the Mintz software used for this work (Zerogpt) is identified “How much” by writing flags such as AI produced, ATI exteriesectors are not perfect and problematic, but they are in contact with different things.
Also, Mintz’s argument is useful. But if self-reliant teachers are about to fight against strong or magical purposes, they will do well to show appreciation for the nuinsules.
Source link
