USA News

The court includes more than 1,600 cases of sexual harassment against Uber

The Screen District Court has issued more than 1,600 sexual crimes allowed to continue before the San Francisco judge, comply with the results of the Ride-Haanging New Silicon Valley app.

The decision issued on Monday We support the first decision by the State Trate Council appointed to include public suits nationwide.

Experts say that the accusation is closely followed by home platforms, dog travel services and other “private-contractor” programs, and also hit the important sexual harassment, as well as the great competition of Uber, Lyft.

Uber contradicted a four-year-old prisoner in a good step of its contract in a passenger agreement in joining any heavy charge against platform.

Hundreds of survivors searched Tech Giant Skimed on the background checks, failing to report sexual violence against the police and allow wrongdoers to continue to the company – everything while banks paid. “

The App Court said Federal Law Trumps Terms of Agrum Trumping Terms of Use Uber’s, US Charles R1 R. California Northern Cyer Reyer.

Judge Lucy Haeron Koh wrote in the Supreme Court Decision that 50 years of patience stopped against the Restaurant Return, except “one example”

“Uber believed we had to be first,” the judge wrote.

Experts say that the legal decision in the ground contract users are allowed before order, sending the eBook or to view their lab results. Long wades are unavoidable, and they have been the only limits, said experts.

“Most people do not even read these goals,” Lindsay said, the Impact Fund administrative director, a social justice group – however the Click-To-Control contracts.

Uber did not respond to requests, but in its 9th Regional lawyers, platform lawyers argued that “each platform contributed to the achievement of its independence rather than one offense.

“The terms of the use allows the Plaintiffs to have its own court,” said Uber lawyers. “Plaintiffs just agreed to do that individually.”

But with the other followers, however, Uber can easily cause governmental cases together, some large companies will write the same military courts, making it very difficult for victims to collapse.

By obstructing clause, experts said, the Court kept the rights many users have never seen if they were asked to give.

“The best winner of the Consumer and the bad day of Tech companies,” Kathryn Kosmides, a lawyer on survivors, partnership between the victim’s lawyers and a person’s injuries. “The latter decision enemies the basis of app safety. Many companies are very scared about what’s going on [next] in this case.”

In a sense, the decision is simple: In accordance with the survivors and the Panel, the 9th cycle confirmed the Court of Managing its business. Integrating the same cases saved taxpayers, helping a tax rate and avoiding the prior education decisions that can be in conflict, KOH wrote in his decision.

It is normal. About 70% of the Federal Civil Actions are currently judged as part of the multididudity case, BREYERER is estimated.

“The biggest number of majestic,” said there with the multidistic Calamad.

The lawyers say that they opposed one case in the Courthouse one is easy and cheaper than the biggest conflict in courts across the country. It is also good that complainants, most looking for similar sets of documents from your submissive companies.

Consolidated Chatigate can make it easier that the plaintiffs prove that evil is claimed to be denominations, experts said. Companies that lays or lives such cases may change their work, rather than merely.

Johnson & Johnson was forced to stop using TALC in flour in Flowing in 2023, following the United States that showed records that indicates that records create the Councilors of the century.

The combined suit against OxContin-Maker Purdue, which is widely considered OPIoid disaster engine, led to the greatest achievement of the damage to the American history.

In the case of Uber, the loss can mean that the background checks, strengthening the rules around who can find the passengers, and put cameras to record all the ride, between one change.

Such changes will cost and unpleasant. But it is not the result of the running app that is trying to avoid.

The medium-term crimes can make large proof of proof tolls part of the public record. Uber has been fighting for months to avoid being detected in the Northern California district while the Applellate Court weighing that the case lies there.

“Did Ber want this data they had about sexual assault? No!” Said Kosmides.

Now that the 9 cycle refused their crisis, “it cannot promote them by receiving this judge and the court holding the judge, because it is finally a community,” said.

“I think we will see more of those followed,” Kosmides said.


Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button