Teacher Union accuses to withdraw the TUMP Admin Dei lead

The clergy and social unity challenges the Department of Education and the Book of Non-previously seen – announced all informal planning – a case against Tuesday evening.

The American Federation of Thiokers and the American Social Association argues in court, sent to the Maryland Federal Court, after I ordered the books “will make the separation of fragile schools like our sites.”

“This invisible and clearest form is a major attack on students, our technology and knowing themselves … and there is promise of Emple Asful to all,” said the camp of the United States in a statement. “It would have raised the lives of the camp.”

The accusers seek the Federal Judge to issue the first command that prevents the department from enforcing the guidance and announcing that the book is not reliable and illegal. “

The prominent legal challenge came three days before the Feb Deadline. 28. The Scripture of Four pages and universities must support any race-based policies, activities and resources at the end of the day or investigation and investigation.

The department allows its requirements through the new court registration in court in court in the High Court in the Pugrime High Court in the 2023 years in the students. Harvard, which prevented the race processing from college maturity. Although the Supreme Court’s decision worked directly to the approval, Trump management believed to extend themselves to all ethnic work.

On Friday, Judge from the same Social Court in Maryland issued a temporary order to a separate group that blocked the president of the President.

The higher legal experts say that a dear business with the larger orders, although the same, independent lever, therefore does not affect by the Department. The Department of Education has also been moving forward through the translation of this law and the last time.

So all eyes are at this recent court case, as higher education leaders wait to see if the judge will issue a second command and prevent the guidance.

“The Department of Education, Shown in February” a Dear book “is seeking to look down on our country’s education institutions and is an illegal effort to enforce certain behavior,” said Sky Perryman, the President of the Plaintiffs. “We will continue to pursue all the legal opportunities that contradict the relief abuse with freedom of speech and principles such as all and our country.”

In the meantime, high-quality teams that urge colleges and universities to remain calm and overweight in the book of colleagues.

On Tuesday American Council of Education sent a letter to Craig, calling for the country’s rights, asking for ‘withdrawing DCL “and worked with a clear understanding of the book before putting the new language.

“For the last two years, our college colleges and transformers are working hard to explore and change, such as visible policies and practices in the process of SFA in the SFA and active rights,” Ace president at Ted Mitchell wrote. “It is unrealistic that the Department has searched institutions to respond properly to this very comprehensive FEDERANCE law in just two weeks and the income required.”

In the Milo, AFT and other complainants make the same arguments, saying that book is “clear, quarreling and law, and will speak to the talk.” The complaint also claims that the guidance violates the first and fifth amendments and exceeds the official authority of the agency.

“This publication is an illegal effort by the Department to force these management opinions how schools should work as if it is law,” said the case. Then it continues to explain that threatening losses will cause immediate injury to higher education institutions and their areas.

“Many members of the Plaintiffs’ doing works, and they were years old, now they could, before the days,” explains a dress. “A letter, showing Dei programs as ‘sensible services,’ undergo the missions and needs, their members and their schools.”