Three Juh’s Ira’s JUD QUESTIONS

IRA Good is well known and highly respected within our partial learning community and online. In John Hopkins University, IRA works at the VOSTS Office as a special adviser about digital systems, and is the Director of open education in Bloomberg health school.

Q: Tell us about your roles in the voospist office and Bloomberg School. What does your work in Hopkins include and put your leadership positions?

A: My work at the VOSTST’s office focuses on three goals: New expansion in digital technology, facilitating cooperation and coordination in Coupleral lines, and managing our involvement with CourseRA.

The biggest project that includes all three goals is the Digital Education Education and Learning Technology Shake (Delta) Step. Each year, we use part of our Course Royalty Revenue benefits to provide internal grants that arrives at $ 75,000 to develop, to use and evaluate the new technology intended to promote teaching and learning. To date, we give more than $ 2.6 million groups at $ 2.6 different groups of different ways, including VR / Ar, AI products, reading development programs and others.

We also hold a teaching for year that brings together the wisdom and education for learning workers from the other Jobes Hopkins to allow the conversation, stimulating new thinking and early to advance the best teaching. The following form will be held May 1.

In the Bloomberg School of Public Health, I lead a small medium center to teach. We focus on our care in developing open experiences and opening education services for private students and government teachers across our legal and religious systems. We are supporting the development of more than 80 MOOC, special and teaching programs, and we are in the new Building Plans of JHU.

The Recovery project is a good example of communication between two roles. The Bloomberg School for teaching and learning is a platform, but we will serve as an OER storage area from all university, and the authority of publication will be distributed to reduce bottles.

Q: Looking forward to 2025, What challenges, styles and online learning and digital reading is in your mind?

A: Hope it’s okay that my answers passes 2025.

I am curious about how higher education will be affected in the coming years by getting to the students in their first school years being disturbed by a distinctuity of 19 and transforming emergencies. Old members of that time will strike high school this year, and it will not be long before he arrives (or not) in our campuses. Which expectations will you experience with digital reading? Will they notify one’s exceptional experiences from modern students? What learning habits will bring them? Therefore, I see the opportunity to start designing that for Cohort reading experiences now. How can we prepare them to provide them with a higher education experience that meets their needs and helping them to persecute?

Also, I spent a lot of time thinking about David Wiley’s latest argument about the impact of AI opened in open education sources. In September, he gave a talk entitled “Why the Education Opening will be” at the University of Regina. In it, the Generative AI has the ability to be a successful tool than the higher access to higher access due to a major impact on the Authorization process, review and searching for educational instruments.

This is a provocative position, and I don’t know what things will play as they predict. No matter, I want to be able to see the productive AI and OER connections in the coming years.

Q: What advice can you give to the first or the midcarer corporation who is interested in working for digital leadership / online?

A: I will encourage them to look for opportunities to reduce institutional conflict and develop reputation for cleaning roads instead of implementing obstacles. A certain number of conflict is required for managing the risk and promotion of high quality work, but a lot of senior conflict comes from a simple Nertia.

People who wish to lead could make much progress in understanding the issues that prevents the angels who were difficult and working to minimize them in behalf of their organizations.

Of course, people ran the risk of being guards from gateway as they progressed to leadership, so it is important to ask personal ideas and the number of solutions and look at new solutions instead of trusting in the elders.